POER In The News View Our Site Map Visit Our Careers Page Contact Us

 

The Most Thorough Property Tax News Available in the Industry

 
 
 
Texas Appeals Must Consider
Combined Values

By Foy Mitchell, Dallas

Print Version (.PDF)



With the June 2 protest deadline approaching, Texas taxpayers must understand that appeals cannot legally challenge the value of land and improvements separately. Appeals based on uniform and equal treatment must focus on the entire property value.

Supreme Court to Rule

A lawsuit filed by a Williamson County taxpayer challenged only the land portion of his property assessment. The Williamson County Appraisal District (WCAD) responded by filing a special exception, alleging the tax code does not provide for unequal appraisals based solely on the land of an improved property.

The trial court granted WCAD’s special exception and ordered the taxpayer to replead the case based on an unequal appraisal of the entire property. When the taxpayer refused to replead, the trial court dismissed the case.

The taxpayer then took his argument to the Third Court of Appeals in Austin. He claimed that since the Legislature amended the tax code requiring value notices to include separate listings of the land and its improvements, then appeals could be based only on the land component.

The Court of Appeals rejected this argument as reflected in its opinion:

Although the land and improvement values may present contestable issues, we hold that the total improved property value--which includes both the land and improvement components--is the only appraised value that the taxpayer may appeal.

The petitioner then asked for a review by the Texas Supreme Court. This link gives the most up-to-date information on the case.

POER Recommends

This case establishes a firm basis for appeals made under the equal and uniform provisions of the tax code. However, by demonstrating that one of the components of the overall value (land or improvements) is the contributor to an inequitable total value, a solution is offered by the courts. It is clear from this ruling that the central argument must revolve around the combined value of the property.


Copyright © 2005 Marvin F. Poer and Company. All Rights Reserved.
Legal Disclaimer | Privacy Policy