POER In The News View Our Site Map Visit Our Careers Page Contact Us

 

The Most Thorough Property Tax News Available in the Industry

 
 
 
Texas Higher Values = Higher Assessments = Higher Taxes
By Foy Mitchell, Dallas

Print Version (.PDF)


The thriving commercial real estate sector has pushed 2007 tax rolls up by double digits throughout North Central Texas. The rise in values equates to large tax assessment hikes. Since local jurisdictions will certainly not lower tax rates by double digits, bills issued this month will be higher for most property owners.

The record value increases indicate the need for strong representation to mitigate unrealistic assessments and resulting overstated tax bills.


Not All Assessments Are Correct

Even though appraisal authorities endeavor to value property accurately and fairly, the simple magnitude of their assignment insures they can not achieve acceptable accuracy on every parcel.

Inasmuch as they tend to concentrate on high profile and high-value properties, using assumed “typical” income, expense and cap rates, their processes assure a number of erroneous valuations.

In many instances, property assessments can still be negotiated, even if they have been approved by appraisal appeal boards. The Texas Tax Code makes provisions for substantial error and joint motion appeals.

Substantial Error Appeals
To qualify for a Substantial Error Appeal, the subject property must be over-assessed by at least 33 percent and there must be no previous appeal filed during the assessment year in question.

There is a 10 percent penalty imposed if the Substantial Error Appeal is successful. This is meant to discourage the use of this appeal over the regular pre-roll and protest procedure.

The Substantial Error Appeal can be filed up to January 31 for the preceding year’s assessment.

Joint Motion Appeal
Owners whose properties have been overassessed but do not qualify for the Substantial Error Appeal have the option of filing a Joint Motion to Correct Value. This motion may also be filed up to January 31 for the preceding year’s assessment.

These appeals are especially useful to owners who purchase property after the appeal deadline or who inadvertently miss the deadline.

It is imperative that all appeal opportunities be pursued in times of rapidly rising property tax assessments. Failure to act in a timely manner often results in a value being “assumed” to be correct. This makes future attempts to correct an erroneous value much more difficult.

 

2007 North Texas
Property Values Soar


Dallas
In Dallas County, the $161.2 billion tax roll was helped by $4.3 billion in new construction. This is $640 million more than last year, according to the county budget director.

Commercial property values rose an average 15.5% in Dallas County, while residential values increased 7.5%.

Southern Dallas County is experiencing the biggest economic boom with the development of distribution centers, warehouses and other industrial properties. Commercial values in Hutchins were up 44%, which translated into an increase of almost 30% for the city as a whole.

Tarrant
The City of Fort Worth is the driving factor in Tarrant County’s value gains. With a 13% increase in the tax base, it’s considered the fastest growing large city in the nation.

Tarrant County’s chief appraiser was quoted as saying commercial development along the I-35W corridor in North Fort Worth continues to fuel the increase. Also growth continues to spread in the northern, western and southern edges of the county where there is plenty of undeveloped land.

Collin
The Collin Central Appraisal District reports about half of its 10.9% tax roll increase comes from new construction and half from higher values on existing property.

There were only two exceptions to the growth trend to the north. The Collin County portion of Richardson declined in value by 1.2 percent. City officials attribute the drop to a 10-year tax abatement given to Texas Instruments for its chip plant. Blue Ridge was the only town entirely within Collin County that experienced a decrease in value. The decline was less than 1 percent.


Copyright © 2005 Marvin F. Poer and Company. All Rights Reserved.
Legal Disclaimer | Privacy Policy